andallthat.co.uk
  • Blog
  • GCSE / A Level Topics
    • America 1789-1900
    • Antisemitism
    • British Radicalism 1789-1900
    • Crusades
    • Elizabeth I
    • Germany 1919-45
    • Historical Interpretations
    • Historic Environment
    • International Relations 1900-2000
    • Italian Renaissance
    • Medicine
    • Medieval Kings
    • Russia 1855-1921
    • Soviet Russia
    • Politics Files
  • KS3 Topics
    • Interpretations
    • Stand-Alone Lessons
    • NEW KS3 File Store
    • OLD KS3 File Store
    • Student Resources
  • Advice
    • GCSE Options
    • A Level Options
    • Personal Studies
    • University Applications >
      • Choosing Courses
      • General Advice
      • Personal Statements
      • Predicted Grades
  • Teachers
    • YHEP Teach Meet
    • Stand-Alone Lessons >
      • Ancient World
      • Medieval World
      • Early Modern
      • Industrial Revolution
      • Modern World
      • Post-Modern World
    • KS3 Teaching Resources
  • MeetTheHistorians
  • Trips
  • About
    • SubBlog
  • Contact

Which History GCSE to choose? Getting your head around 2015 changes (9-1)

4/19/2015

6 Comments

 
Picture
If you want to get straight to the documents, they are a the bottom of this post.

To be fair, I probably need to get more of a life, but ever since the new GCSE draft specifications for history were published, I have been dying to compare them and see which I like best. Now I need to declare some personal interest before I begin - I am currently involved in writing for the America unit of the OCR B specification. However I have come at this with a genuinely open mind because what I think is good history, and what I think might be best for the students at my school are two connected but different things! 

What I am presenting here therefore is a summary of each of the specifications and its means of assessment. The comments are meant to help me quickly compare and contrast the options and see which might be most appropriate. I have not compared every unit as there are some I know we won't do, however the basic structure of most of the units is the same. Please feel free to let me have any comments.

Before I go any further I should probably provide a bit of context. I currently head a department in a fairly average, northern state secondary. Mixed intake with a slightly lower than average % of PP students and a predominantly white intake. Our results for GCSE are historically in the 60-70% range for A*-C although it was much higher when we did the History Pilot. We get around 140 students a year choosing history (around 60% of the year group) and from very mixed abilities. Most classes have students with predictions from F/G to A*. The majority are around the B/C mark on 3LP. We get good uptake to A Level - around 50-60 per year. When looking at GCSE changes I was therefore bearing the following in mind:
  • Choosing the best possible history to prepare students for A Level and build on what we do at KS3.
  • BUT accessible enough to teach to students with mixed ability and in mixed ability classes.
  • Moving away from GCSE as an aberration between good KS3 and A Level courses - ideally something with less prescriptive examination. Teachers have been getting very bored with the prescriptive nature of the GCSE examinations in OCR SHP.
  • Interesting and engaging topics for our students (I have more research to do on this) with a focus on people's lives over high politics.
  • A coherent course which could be built chronologically over three years.
  • No major overlap with our A Level options: Russia 1855-1964, America 1740-1796, and Britain 1900-1951.
  • Our KS3 prepares students for a range of options at GCSE without being a repeat eg. we focus in a bit on Hitler's rise and the Holocaust but not life in Nazi Germany. We look at the development of the Cold War but not Stalin's time in power etc.
  • Being aware that the C+ (5+) borderline is a big issue for us.
  • Not having to constantly change our Controlled Assessment unit every year.
  • Not spending ages relearning new content when new A Levels are on the way - novelty within realistic bounds.

The tables I offer here try to compare the offerings from different boards. it is worth noting that all boards require schools to cover: a thematic study, a period study, a British depth study, a world depth study, and a study of the historic environment. They also require that schools cover three periods: medieval, early modern and modern.

  1. The spec comparisons look at how each board has approached the 5 different units required by the new GCSE. I have made comments on how the content has been approached and offer some of my own thoughts in light of our aims.
  2. The examination comparisons use the sample assessment materials. I have tried to look for how the boards have set out the marks and what they will be rewarding. I have also tried to keep an eye out for where they expect students to jump hoops or learn tricks. I have considered the balance of longer and shorter questions and have also tried to point out how many different question techniques students might need to grapple with.

Right - no more context - here are the comparison tables. I hope they are of some use.

Mr F
6 Comments
John
5/5/2015 05:10:17 am

Thanks for sharing this!

Reply
Alex Ford
5/19/2016 02:33:03 pm

I am glad it has been useful

Reply
JimA
5/19/2016 12:44:49 pm

You are a wonderful person. Good karma to you sir!!
Thanks for this. Very helpful

Reply
Alex Ford
5/19/2016 02:32:38 pm

You are welcome. It is always hard to find time to trawl specs fully when there is so much else to do in schools!

Reply
Oliver
1/3/2017 07:28:56 pm

This is a very useful comparison, thanks. We have started the Edexcel spec but have been talking as a department about potentially exploring AQA in future years - appears less content heavy, though as you mention, varied question stems etc.

OCR is coherent and historically good (in our opinion!) but perhaps range of content is significantly more demanding than competitors..?

Reply
Alex Ford
1/3/2017 08:29:49 pm

You're welcome. I think a few schools might opt to change boards after seeing the content depth involved. I actually think OCR B is quite accessible, but then I also have a vested interest there. At the end of the day you choose the best fit for the department and kids

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Tweets by @AndAllThatWeb

    Archives

    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    August 2018
    July 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    November 2015
    October 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    November 2014
    October 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    April 2013
    February 2013
    December 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    March 2011
    February 2011
    June 2000

    Categories

    All
    2014 KS3 Curriculum
    Book Review
    BUSK Reading
    Christmas
    Comment
    History Ancient
    History C19th
    History C20th
    History Early Modern
    History Medieval
    History Thematic
    PGCE
    Rant
    Teachers Assessment
    Teachers Case Study
    Teachers Classroom Management
    Teachers Concepts
    Teachers Conference Notes
    Teachers Curriculum
    Teachers Exams
    Teachers Frideas
    Teachers Government
    Teachers Leadership
    Teachers Misc
    Teachers NQT
    Teachers Pedagogy
    Teachers Planning
    Teachers Progression
    Teachers Purpose
    Teachers Stand Alone Lessons
    Teachers Technology
    Teachers Training
    Teachers Trips
    Teaching Personnel
    Tvfilm Reviews79f7bb4075

    RSS Feed

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.