andallthat.co.uk
  • Blog
    • SubBlog
  • America 1789-1900
  • MeetTheHistorians
  • Contact

"Who shot JFK?" and other historical problems. Part 3: role playing power imbalances through slave auctions

2/21/2019

1 Comment

 
Picture
In my previous two blogs I looked at the problems with teaching the assassination of JFK as a murder mystery, and with imagination type activities in learning about the Holocaust. Today I want to explore one of the most controversial lessons I have witnessed.

The “slave auction”
Reading the title of this, I hope most people would be baulking already. However, in the last five years, I have heard of this kind of lesson being used in multiple history departments and the image above is not invented but actually came from a grammar school in the South East. Just as with the Holocaust example I gave last time, this type of activity can end up being done in multiple topic areas, but effectively involves role-playing an extreme power imbalance.
​
The reasons departments persist with “lessons” like this one are usually vaguely couched in terms of empathy, and the need to clarify complex concepts like chattel slavery. However, more often than not they are promoted for their “interactive”, or “engaging” elements. Indeed, one non-historian described seeing such a lesson to me once as being “a good, fun way to get across a difficult idea.”
Picture
I could spend a whole career detailing why asking one group of students to be “slaves” and another group to be “buyers” in an auction is a pretty shaky premise for a history lesson. However, I will limit myself to three points from the myriad I could make (in no particular order):

  1. The concept of people owning, buying or selling others is abhorrent and challenging on a moral level. However, it is not complex. A whole lesson to communicate this basic notion seems unnecessary, especially with the associated issues of this particular lesson.
  2. On a moral- and social- level the concept of running an auction does not encourage empathy, but ends up reinforcing prejudices and perpetuating the moral underpinnings of the original system. I cannot think of a single instance of these kinds of lesson where one or more students hasn’t found fun in the bidding wars, without considering the implications of this. Indeed, such power experiments would almost certainly be denied ethical approval for a researcher. More than this, real, historical slaves are denied their voice simply by the fact they are being “played” by modern child-actors with no concept of the lived realities of the people they supposedly represent. And it doesn’t matter if you make all the kids with red ties, or blue eyes, the “victims”, the problems remain.
  3. I cannot think of a good historical reason to teach the horrors of slavery via this means. In fact the whole topic area is usually awash with poorly conceived ideas (see the "create a runaway slave poster" task above for example)

Of course, I am not saying for one minute that history teachers should ignore, or underplay the extreme trauma of slave auctions. But we need to be able to trust that our students can find the same horror in the archival details, the records, the accounts, which presumably so incensed us when we first heard or read them.

If we really want students to see the impact of slavery on people, then there are many accounts written by escaped slaves which are far more visceral and poignant for being true. An enquiry such as “What can the life of Charles Ball (or Mary Prince, or any number of others) reveal about the horrors of slavery” places a real person at the centre of the study. It also allows us to see the ways in which Ball challenged, and was forced to accept the realities of slavery – making him an key actor in the story.
​
Another approach might be to ask: “How did people survive despite slavery?” Such a question draws very much on the work of Edward Baptist, who makes this one of his central questions in his excellent “The Half Has Never Been Told” (2014). Such an approach would allow a focus on the ways in which the slave system attempted to reduce people to units: so many heads or hands; but how those kept in slavery resisted through the communities they built, stories they told, and lives they continued to live in adversity. I challenge you for example to read Baptist’s retelling of the story of the enslaved Joe Kilpatrick and his daughters, and not be moved to tears with both sadness and pride.

Picture
Examples are not in short supply either, there are thousands of fascinating lives just waiting to be shared with students. Whilst it is vital students understand the violence of the slave system, they also need to appreciate how it enacted social annihilation on those caught up within it. The life of Susie King Taylor shows how states attempted to stop black Americans from being educated. It also shows how Susie overcame this attempt to limit her learning and went on to write her own autobiography. The same might be said of Martha Hodges, whose post reconstruction story reveals the social death caused by not being allowed to marry under US law, as well as broader struggles and prejudices faced by ex-slaves living in the "new" South. 

​More than anything, teaching about slavery, or the Holocaust, or any other controversial topic requires a deep and fundamental engagement with what we hope to achieve. What is the role of history when discussing the slave trade or genocide? Should the purpose of teaching slavery be to shock the students, or help them appreciate that slaves were real people, with real lives, who lived just like any other historical actors as part of their moments in time? Should we tell students about the Holocaust so that they are moved to tears, or to help them understand how such a cataclysmic event grew insidiously over time, rather than being a strange anomaly of the 1930s? Whatever our answer(s), we need to hold these things at the centre of our planning throughout. Here Peter Kenez wrestles with the similar issue as he begins his book on the coming of the Holocaust.:
Picture
Being incensed by injustice is one thing, but unless we encourage our students as historians to ask questions such as “Why did slavery continue for so long in the Americas / Britain / Europe?”, or “When did the Holocaust become inevitable?” we fail to bring anything of note to the table. It is only by addressing these big questions, grounded in a clear historical purpose, that we truly help students to understand the object of historical study: humanity. 

I hope you have found this blog series helpful. As ever, I would love to hear your thoughts. Have I missed out anything crucial (probably)? Or are there particular historical topics which make you equally worried? Let me know in the comments below.
1 Comment
N Hawkins
3/17/2021 08:54:25 pm

An interesting article and many points I would agree with. Particularly the difficulty and obvious ethical questionable practice of the auction and the other points mentioned.

Having said that, to respond to your last point- "good historical reason" Could this lesson not be unpacked? Not in a way to try and justify it through "empathy" but to consider the way in which economic forces allowed people to subvert their moral and ethical objections and view the people sold as commodities to better their own financial standing? The auction itself has little to do with any second order conceptual understanding but this could be planned into such an activity albeit substantially modified.


Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Image (c) LiamGM (2024) File: Bayeux Tapestry - Motte Castle Dinan.jpg - Wikimedia Commons

    Archives

    August 2024
    November 2022
    September 2022
    April 2022
    February 2022
    March 2021
    August 2020
    July 2020
    October 2019
    August 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    August 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    February 2017
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    July 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    November 2015
    October 2015
    August 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    January 2015
    November 2014
    October 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    November 2013
    October 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    April 2013
    February 2013
    December 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    March 2011
    February 2011
    June 2000

    Categories

    All
    2014 KS3 Curriculum
    Book Review
    BUSK Reading
    Christmas
    Comment
    History Ancient
    History C19th
    History C20th
    History Early Modern
    History Medieval
    History Thematic
    Ofsted
    PGCE
    Rant
    Teachers Assessment
    Teachers Case Study
    Teachers Classroom Management
    Teachers Concepts
    Teachers Conference Notes
    Teachers Curriculum
    Teachers Exams
    Teachers Frideas
    Teachers Government
    Teachers Leadership
    Teachers Misc
    Teachers NQT
    Teachers Pedagogy
    Teachers Planning
    Teachers Progression
    Teachers Purpose
    Teachers Stand Alone Lessons
    Teachers Technology
    Teachers Training
    Teachers Trips
    Tvfilm Reviews79f7bb4075

    RSS Feed

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.
  • Blog
    • SubBlog
  • America 1789-1900
  • MeetTheHistorians
  • Contact