andallthat.co.uk
  • Blog
    • SubBlog
  • America 1789-1900
  • MeetTheHistorians
  • Contact

Creating flight paths to replace levels Year 7-11 - the impact of the new GCSE grade descriptors

7/17/2016

10 Comments

 
So with very little fanfare, the grade descriptors for the new GCSE grades 9-1 were released on Friday. Those schools who have opted to use these as a progression model, assessment system and general replacement for both NC Levels and GCSE grades must be delighted that they can finally start implementing their systems.
​
In this blog I want to take a look at how these grade descriptors can be utilised from Years 7-11 to provide a clear and coherent flight path for pupils in history. 

Using the grade descriptors to create a flight path

Many schools for instance have opted for the following basic flight path:
Picture
As such, the grade descriptors will help to define what this path might look like for pupils in lessons. They could be used as part of the reporting process, discussed with parents and form targets for written feedback….
Picture
Oh! They only seem to have defined three of the descriptors. Not to worry, heads of department can fill in the gaps. This should be a fairly straightforward task – it is just a case of making the missing steps logical progressions…
Picture
Hmmmm…. That turned out to be a little more difficult than anticipated. The problem is that these things all seem a bit… well…. vague. Not to worry, maybe it is just a case of using the Assessment Objectives from the specification and making sure there is a clear path for each of them. That way it will be much more precise and linked to the exams.
Picture
On reflection, those seem a bit vague too… It doesn't seem to give us much to go on...I mean, what are key features and characteristics? And of what periods? I wonder if this needs to be what they study in each year or in the whole 5 years? Seems a bit odd.... Also it doesn't seem to specify which second order concepts count...

No problem, I am sure the subject experts can work it out. Let’s see now… what could be done with AO2?
Picture
PictureLook how happy everyone is that this will fit onto a SIMS mark sheet!
There, that wasn’t so hard. I mean, I am not entirely certain how we are going to judge these... or what coherent causal explanation actually looks like....or how it is different to convincing causal explanation, but hey ho, I am sure it will come out in the wash.

Oh! One last thing... for the purposes of tracking we just need to split these down a bit, because moving a Grade a year makes it really hard to show "Progress" TM . The way it is set up doesn’t really give enough resolution. We will need to subdivide this a bit I think. Let’s have a go at the steps between Grade 6 and 7. Because this is decimal system, I think 10 subdivisions would be appropriate, don’t you? That way they should move about 2 points a half term. Just think how well that would track on Excel! We could have boxes that changed colour and everything....

Picture
Can’t see any issues with this now. Just need to get HoDs to write these for each of the AOs (I think that's something like 400 descriptors for history, give or take) and Bob’s your uncle.
Picture
An apology
I apologise if I am being overly facetious here, but the number of conversations I have had in recent months about the use of GCSE grade descriptors to replace levels just beggars belief. In the very worst cases, the idea is to use GCSE grades from Year 7 so that pupils can see where they are on a flight path to the end of Year 11. I have talked about the issues with linear progression models at great length before HERE. I also want to ass that this is not really the fault of these descriptors as they have not been designed as a progression model but as a loose description to guide the grading of a TWO YEAR GCSE COURSE as specified in one of a number of accredited specifications. However, I want to pick up on two problems directly related to this model.

Problem 1: Communicating with pupils and parents
Let’s just imagine I have a Year 7 pupil who has come to me on a GCSE Grade 2. What will move her to a Grade 3? Well instantly I note that I have to go to my “made up” steps in between the existing descriptors. But even if I used Grade 5 as the target instead, what would I say? “Make your reasoning less basic and more coherent!”? What would this actually mean? What would I be wanting her to do? And what reasoning? In what? Her studies at Year 7 content, or the study of the Year 10-11 content she has not yet covered? It is deeply unhelpful. There is absolutely nothing in these Grades grounded in curriculum and therefore they are largely useless as a formative measure for assessing curriculum. As a means of discussing progression, they are hopeless!

Problem 2: It makes no sense
Let’s take the same Year 7 pupil on her Level 2. According to many flight paths my aim as a teacher would be to move her from having “generalised knowledge” in Year 7 to having “mostly accurate knowledge” at the end of Year 11. Why on earth would I want to spend 5 years teaching her anything other than detailed, accurate and relevant knowledge? There is no stage in my teaching where I have ever aspired for children to have a generalised or inaccurate knowledge, or even partial knowledge of what we are learning - I expect them to have a complete and detailed knowledge of whatever topic we study, as appropriate to the focus of that study, be that the ending of the transatlantic slave trade, or the significance of the First Crusade. Naturally not all will hit these lofty heights, but I never ask them to aim for semi-relevance or partial accuracy – that would be madness. I would argue that the best Year 7s should be able to demonstrate those Grade 8 or 9 features in a particular unit of study (say the Battle of Hastings) in so far as they have a grasp of that content appropriate to their age and experience of history. I have certainly read some astounding essays on the impact of the Norman conquest which would definitely be at Grade 8 on this scale, but if I sat those same Year 7s in a GCSE exam they would clearly fail due to their lack of other subject knowledge AND the fact that the content of their Normans unit was studied to a Year 7 level. It would be unfair however to say that their knowledge was incomplete, or that their command of relevant information was partial.

A plea
If you are still in a school heading down the road of using GCSE grade descriptors for every purpose from assessment to progression model, and from Years 7 to 11, please take a moment to reconsider. There is a vast amount of great materials on alternatives, much of which I have linked HERE. Please do take the time to read over it and ensure that you replace levels with something which is meaningful to both students and teachers, rather than easy to put on a spreadsheet!

10 Comments
Frances
7/17/2016 05:21:11 pm

The grade descriptors won't be used in awarding, because they are not at the key grades (1,4,7). The awards will be primarily statistically driven, and awarding committees will only look at work around the 1,4 and 7 boundaries.

Reply
Alex Ford
7/17/2016 06:05:17 pm

Indeed. In fact they will be almost entirely stat driven as this excellent summary explains:

https://missdcoxblog.wordpress.com/2016/07/17/a-brief-guide-to-the-new-gcse-grade-boundaries/

Reply
Kevin Hewitson link
7/18/2016 06:30:12 am

What could be really effective, given the right circumstances, would be students filing their own "flight paths".

Reply
Alex Ford
7/18/2016 07:38:32 am

I think we need to get away from the idea of a flight path. Assessment should focus primarily on curriculum and content covered, supported by conceptual understanding. Flight paths suggest that all previous content has been fully absorbed and mastered, which may not be the case

Reply
Ed Podesta link
8/2/2016 05:48:48 am

Love this - hate flightpaths. Can easily imagine students being told that their next step is 'to produce a pleasingly coherent line of argument'.

Reply
Alex Ford
8/2/2016 08:18:01 am

Have seen that kind of thing so many times it is just unfunny. It is like the old feedback on GCSE type questions. You either give vague advice related to the generic mark scheme or you offer a trick (add 2 pieces of evidence, or make sure you come to a definite conclusion). Ends up pulling people further and further away from writing great history

Reply
Ian Phillips
8/10/2017 07:43:30 pm

Can you have pleasingly coherent drivel?
This is worse that I imagined from your tweet.
Can see some SLTs squeezing their thighs over this.

Reply
Mary link
4/5/2019 11:30:21 pm

Love the Batman photo, haha.

Reply
Water Damage Restoration Brentwood link
9/25/2022 03:27:37 am

Thanks great blogg post

Reply
Elena link
7/19/2024 07:39:41 am

Great readingg your blog

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Image (c) LiamGM (2024) File: Bayeux Tapestry - Motte Castle Dinan.jpg - Wikimedia Commons

    Archives

    August 2024
    November 2022
    September 2022
    April 2022
    February 2022
    March 2021
    August 2020
    July 2020
    October 2019
    August 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    August 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    February 2017
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    July 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    November 2015
    October 2015
    August 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    January 2015
    November 2014
    October 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    November 2013
    October 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    April 2013
    February 2013
    December 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    March 2011
    February 2011
    June 2000

    Categories

    All
    2014 KS3 Curriculum
    Book Review
    BUSK Reading
    Christmas
    Comment
    History Ancient
    History C19th
    History C20th
    History Early Modern
    History Medieval
    History Thematic
    Ofsted
    PGCE
    Rant
    Teachers Assessment
    Teachers Case Study
    Teachers Classroom Management
    Teachers Concepts
    Teachers Conference Notes
    Teachers Curriculum
    Teachers Exams
    Teachers Frideas
    Teachers Government
    Teachers Leadership
    Teachers Misc
    Teachers NQT
    Teachers Pedagogy
    Teachers Planning
    Teachers Progression
    Teachers Purpose
    Teachers Stand Alone Lessons
    Teachers Technology
    Teachers Training
    Teachers Trips
    Tvfilm Reviews79f7bb4075

    RSS Feed

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.
  • Blog
    • SubBlog
  • America 1789-1900
  • MeetTheHistorians
  • Contact